Over the past few weeks, I've heard a version of the same concern from multiple leaders. It doesn't always surface as a clean problem statement. Sometimes it sounds like frustration. Sometimes it sounds like confusion. But the pattern is consistent.
AI is moving. Strategy is set. Tools are licensed. The executive team is aligned, or at least visible. And yet adoption is slow, uneven, and — when you look closely — consistently stalled at the same place: the manager layer.
Not the C-suite, where the energy often lives. Not the frontline teams, who are quietly experimenting on their own. The directors, team leads, and mid-level VPs who sit between leadership intent and daily team behavior: they're the ones carrying the weight of AI change without a clear brief on what to do with it.
What I'm hearing sounds like this: managers want to support AI adoption, but don't know whether they're supposed to be champions, coaches, gatekeepers, or reporters. They're fielding questions from their teams they don't have good answers to. They're absorbing fear they weren't given tools to address. And when the message from above is 'AI is going to change everything, get on board,' they're left to improvise in the gap between the vision and the daily reality.
This pattern is showing up now because most organizations are past the announcement phase. The first wave — mandate plus tool — has already happened. (If you've been reading along since issue 1, you'll recognize this territory.) What comes next requires sustained behavior change at the team level. That's managers' work. But only if managers know what they're supposed to be doing.
Here's the piece I think most senior leaders are missing: enthusiasm is not a narrative.
A CMO I spoke with recently was as energized about AI as anyone I've encountered this year: using it daily, seeing his team produce real results with it, genuinely excited about the possibilities. He talked about it with his team with real conviction. And yet when I asked what he would say to a manager who was worried about what AI meant for their role, his answer was intellectually sound but narratively thin. He had a case, but he didn't have a clear call to action.
A compelling AI narrative does more than explain why AI matters. It tells managers specifically what success looks like for their team, what their role is in getting there, and what the organization is (and, just as importantly, isn't) trying to accomplish. Without that, a leader's enthusiasm is just pressure. Managers feel it, but don't know what to do with it.
That's where AI adoption often gets stuck: not with resistant employees, and not with distracted executives. With the layer nobody equipped.